A Square Root of life?

Can we find the square root of all life, and does this some how determine it?

Of course we can; but what the hell is the point?

Randomness is key
Nothing really seems to be ordered, things which are are ordered in our minds and our socities. Even the ideas of Radical Groupism tends to be an over justification of dependent social functions. For the most part things seem to be an extension of chaos. As said in the previous post our idea of order is simply a way of organizing the world.

Everything thus sees the world different. A bird will organize the world much differently then a ant; for example ant sees a tree what does it define it as? But an Bird sees a tree and defines it much differently. The group ideal takes over what is to be thought; in this sense it can be considered evolutionary. The Bird is seeing a tree as it should because otherwise they may run in to it; or nest some where poorly. Humans do not come with this same sense as it seems. Some things may be genetic, such as how to feed when young. Yet this too can be considered part of the 'Human Group.'

Finding a Key
There is no one way to find the answer to the square root of life. Each organized item in the world would have a different finite number which it could look too. For this I always like to look at Douglas Adams and his idea of #42 in Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. As simple as the number sounds it is as close as we can get to really determining the totality of the universe. Others have tried of course; Descartes tried to assign numbers to things; leading to the Binary system. In the end the task was so enormous that he never completed it in the beginning sense; finding an ethical path. Utilitarianism tries; but where it fails is where any look at happiness fails it works on a subjective path.

So what is the problem? We can never objectively determine a mathematical idea of WHAT we are as we being pack members of different groups will ALWAYS allow our subjective thoughts into the process. Even scientists who are supposed to be objective get bogged down with subjectivity of their background. Early scientists were bogged down with the idea of God. It is not because God may or may not exist it is instead attributed to the prominent position of the church during the time period.

So even those who doubted everything (Descartes) lost sight of the fact that the interior thoughts of our groups make up our thought processes. His conclusion on GOD demonstrates this hypothesis. Even though he doubted EVERYTHING other then that he thinked he could still find the world via god. This begs the question; not to mention that the idea of 'I' comes not from his mind but from the cultural surroundings he was in thus in order to doubt everything one must not start from the process of thinking; but instead the deconstruction of the entire human race! As mentioned before this is quite useless.